|
Action
to prevent mismatching patients
with care must involve manual
checking and new technologies
Cambridge Consultants has delivered
its report to the National Patient
Safety Agency (NPSA) identifying
new developments in technology
that could prevent the mismatching
of patients with appropriate
care. The report, as part of
a wider study by the NPSA, will
help to focus the health service
on new technological developments
and improve manual checking
processes.
The
findings from the Cambridge
Consultants study have been
published in a report titled
‘Right patient –
right care’. The report
highlights the areas where technological
advances can be harnessed to
ensure that patient identities
are not confused and that each
patient receives the medication
and care intended for them.
It also points to significant
opportunities to enhance patient
safety by working with the National
Programme for IT (NPfIT) to
ensure that new technologies
such as barcoding, radio frequency
tagging and biometrics such
as fingerprinting are compatible
with it both nationally and
locally.
The NPSA is continuing to monitor
advances in this field and is
interested to hear from anyone
developing initiatives or solutions.
"We will share information
and also promote exchanges between
interested parties," said
Chris Ranger, NPSA’s Head
of Safer Practice. Those wishing
to contribute should email:
rightpatient_rightcare@npsa.nhs.uk.
International research has identified
the problem of mismatching patients
with aspects of care, which
can include confusing one patient
with another, or mismatching
medication, blood or pathology
samples. Where mismatching happens
in surgery, the patient may
have the wrong part of their
body operated on or removed.
Mismatching can result in serious,
lasting harm such as chronic
pain, undiagnosed cancers, blindness
and even death.
Cambridge Consultants was asked
to investigate and research
the technologies that could
be used and found that there
is no single solution to improve
patient matching. In some instances
a mix of technologies will be
appropriate. It also concluded
that the application of technology
in the health service is likely
to change over time with developing
technology and changes in public
acceptance.
The introduction of new technology
can itself create problems and
lead to failures and accidents
if the analysis, design, management
and evaluation fail to take
account of the interface between
people and technology.
The report also cautions that
it is vital to get simple manual
checks right as well. The NPSA
commissioned research on manual
checking from Human Reliability
Associates of Dalton, Lancashire.
This confirmed that mismatching
was a significant area of concern.
Manual checking processes have
rarely, if ever, been subject
to formal risk assessment or
systematic research.
The research found:
- bedside
identity checking, the final
opportunity to pick up any
errors, appears to be a major
source of matching errors;
- the
high rate of hospital in-patients’
wristbands going missing is
a potential obstacle for the
use of automated identification
methods such as barcodes;
- the
tendency for patients not
to be asked their name increases
the risk of errors;
- double
independent checking for high
risk tasks, as used in the
airline industry, is not used
in the health service.
The
NPSA is currently working on
safer patient identification
such as wrist band identification
and checking procedures. These
will be communicated with the
whole health service and other
interested parties such as the
healthcare industry when ways
of avoiding mismatching errors
are developed further. It is
vital that the health service
works with the technology manufacturers
to develop solutions tailor-made
for health service settings.
Chris Ranger said: "There
are many examples of technology
being used in imaginative ways,
for instance to match patients
and blood samples using barcodes,
check patients’ identities
in operating theatres or allow
patients secure access to their
notes in a GP surgery by using
fingerprints . But this work
has shown that improving manual
checking procedures is also
a priority to prevent errors
that can lead to serious patient
harm."
Matthew Allen, a senior consultant
at Cambridge Consultants commented:
"Our research concluded
that in this environment the
reliability of technology is
critically dependent on how
well it is implemented. Whilst
various technologies could be
used for improving patient matching,
none at present will be truly
effective without pre-emptive
programmes to get buy in from
patients and professionals."
The report is available at www.npsa.nhs.uk/health/publications.
Printed copies can be requested
by calling 08701 555455.
Case studies are available from
Alison Pitts-Bland, Head of
Media & Parliamentary Affairs,
National Patient Safety Agency
on 0207 927 9500.
Click
here to download a high-resolution
image
|