|
Industry
leader shares thoughts on UK
healthcare sector for the year
ahead

- private
companies should take the
Alternative Investment Market
(AIM) more seriously and see
it as a stepping stone
- the
findings on pre-emptive rights
from the Myners report will
be critical to public companies
- companies
and investors would benefit
from pan-European biotech
funds and exchange
At the
8th Annual Healthcare Dinner,
which was hosted by Cambridge
Consultants at the end of last
month, the keynote speaker,
Dr. John Brown, identified the
three biggest issues facing
the UK healthcare industry in
2005 and highlighted methods
for maintaining investment momentum.
In his speech he called for
private companies to use AIM
as a stepping stone; the relaxation
of the pre-emption rights following
the Myners report; and the need
for pan-European biotech funds,
to increase the number of specialist
investors available.
"For
private companies a £40
to £50 million glass ceiling
seems to exist when it comes
to funding. If you are in this
position and there is no IPO
opportunity on the main markets,
the business is going to stall
and the momentum, that management
has built, is going to be for
nothing. In the last half of
2004 we saw an increase in the
number of companies who listed
on AIM, and in my opinion AIM
could become the route of choice
after VC funding this year.
More funds now accept AIM stocks
and fund managers see less of
a difference between an AIM
stock and that on the main market"
said Dr. Brown, who sits on
the board of several public
and private UK companies. He
added, "For public companies,
who are at phase III trials
or in a similar position with
regards to capital requirements,
the findings from the Myners
report into pre-emption rights
is vitally important. In the
public arena the BIA (BioIndustry
Association) is pushing hard
to get the rules modified so
that you can raise 20% of equity
a year, instead of just 5% and,
like the majority of the industry,
I look forward to a positive
outcome."
He continued,
"One of the biggest changes
that I would like to see is
the development of pan-European
biotech funds. The reason that
the NASDAQ is so successful
is that there is a big pool
of investors out there, a real
mix of specialists who know
what they are doing and momentum
investors, who are interested
in the sector. We don’t
have a big enough pool of specialists
in the UK to support a vibrant
biotech sector and therefore
we are disadvantaged when it
comes to competing with our
US counterparts. Switzerland
is a hive of activity at the
moment and pan-European funds
would allow many more investors
to participate and international
companies to take advantage.
I’m also interested to
see the outcome from the BIA’s
push for a pan-European biotech
exchange."
The
Healthcare Dinner, which is
held in Cambridge every year,
provides an opportunity for
business leaders from drug discovery,
pharmaceutical, device development
and investment communities to
discuss issues affecting the
industry. Each year a prominent
figure is asked to speak about
the year ahead and identify
the major issues that they see
companies facing. This year
Dr. John Brown, independent
non-executive director and chairman
of Scottish Biomedical was invited.
Dr. Brown sits on the Advisory
Board of the Life Sciences ITI
in Scotland, and is a member
of the DTI Technology Strategy
Board and the DTI Biotechnology
Leadership council. He is also
chairman of BIA Scotland and
until December 2003, he was
Chief Executive of the FTSE250
biotech company Acambis plc.
Dr.
Monika Green, head of Consulting
at Cambridge Consultants added,
"2004 was a difficult
year for healthcare companies
who wanted to IPO. With the
exception of Ark Therapeutics,
for who we wrote an independent
Expert’s Report, we
have seen little activity
in this area. With capital
so important in the healthcare
and biotech industry it is
important for both public
and private companies to identify
all routes available to them.
The UK is struggling against
US competition for one main
reason – continued investment
is so difficult to come by.
If things are not changed
I see much of the UK talent
moving to the US, which is
not good for the sector."
|